DDbDP transcription: sb.26.16623 [xml]
† παρ(έσ)χ(ε) Θ̣εωτώρου(*) (ὑπὲρ) ἐνοικ(ίου)
τῆ(ς) Ἁ̣γ̣ί(ας) Θει̣οτόκ(ου)(*) ἀπὸ Θὼθ α̣
δ ἰνδ(ικτίωνος) ἕως Φαρμ(οῦ)θ(ι) α̣ δετάρτης(*) ἰνδ(ικτίωνος)
λ̣ι̣τ̣ὰ̣ κερ(άτια) δέκα ἐν̣ήα(*) ̣ ̣ ̣ ι(*)θ μ(όνα).
5† δ(ι’) ἐμοῦ ̣ ̣ ̣α̣ι̣ν̣ου †††
Apparatus
^ 1.
l. Θεοδώρου, A. Delattre (via PN) : ̣ε ̣ ̣τωρου prev. ed.^ 2.
l. Θεοτόκ(ου)^ 3.
l. τετάρτης^ 4.
l. ἐννέα^ 4.
ϊθ papyrus
- 2011-04-26T07:59:39.291-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Finalized - ready
- 2011-04-26T07:59:39.284-04:00 [tmh]: Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Lin1: As Sosin notes, the proposed corr. is clear except
for the initial letter, and theta is the most plausible suggestion there. Lin2: I
am inclined to remove \/ from ο of ἀπὸ, cf. emou in lin5 (there should be consistency
in any case) Lin4: <#ι(¨)θ̣=19#> so ed. pr.
- 2011-04-26T07:59:39.273-04:00 [joshuad.sosin]: Vote - AcceptText - Accept. Lin1--> (παρ(έσ)χ(ε)); lin1--> <:<:Θεοδώρου|reg|Θ̣εωτώρου:>|SoSOL:A.
Delattre|.1ε.2τωρου:> ; this is a case of the author correcting himself; I see
'εωτωρου' quite clearly (CE 75 [2000] p.107); the Theta is much harder to construe,
but plausible enough; I am inclined to accept. Lin2,3,4 corr-->reg; lin4 ancient diaeresis
on ι in ιθ; lin4 full stop at end
- 2011-03-08T04:20:08.251-05:00 [Alain%20D.]: Entered text (with a little Sosol correction: name in line 1). The plate allows to
see an omega between the e et the t, the first letter could be a theta: Theôtôrou
(for Theodôrou).
- 2011-02-25T10:41:29-05:00 [editor]: Automated creation from template
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: rationalized languages in langUsage
- 2011-12-14 [gabrielbodard]: changed editor names to URIs
- 2011-11-29 [gabrielbodard]: converted app type=BL|SoSOL to editorial
- 2011-10-04 [Faith]: Automatically updated revision description
- 2011-09-20 [Faith]: Automated transfer of accents across reg-orig pairs
© Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
